Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.

نویسنده

  • D D Raphael
چکیده

The main purpose of this paper (1) is to draw attention to a gap between the principles of Common Law and the principles accepted by many leading medical practitioners on the ethics of allowing severely handicapped infants to die. The Common Law principles are shown in Court of Appeal judgements on two cases. The contrasting principles of many paediatricians were illustrated at the trial of Dr Leonard Arthur. The paper suggests that the gap could be closed by statutory guidance on general principles. It also argues that utilitarian concepts misrepresent the ethical issues of medical dilemmas like this one.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Infanticide and the Handicapped Newborn

Infanticide and the Handicapped Newborn contributes yet more timber to the blazing debate over decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit. Controversy still rages over Baby Doe, a boy born in April 1982, with Down's syndrome and a tracheo-esophageal fistula. His parents refused to allow intravenous feeding and corrective surgery. The baby died at six days of age, survived by such troub...

متن کامل

Supporting of penal rights for infants and observance an medical ethics

Introduction: Infants have a high station in our society and to support an immune life for them in parents, governmental institutions and NGOs. Purpose of this essay is good using of ethic of doctor for getting to mentioned aim. Method: A head text is written with descriptive and analytic method. Results: one of the fundamental missions of penal right is supporting of value as life right that...

متن کامل

Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute.

Since 1973 the practice of infanticide for some severely handicapped newborns has been receiving more open discussion and defence in the literature on medical ethics. A recent and important argument for the permissibility of infanticide relies crucially on a particular concept of personhood that excludes the theological. This paper attempts to show that the dispute between the proponents of inf...

متن کامل

Informed dissent: the views of some mothers of severely mentally handicapped young adults.

Much of the discussion since the Arthur case has centred round the rights of handicapped infants to medical treatment. Little has centred round the question of how far one person can rightly be required to sacrifice her life for another, when she has not been consulted beforehand. This may be due to the fact that most of the discussants are men, while nearly all the carers are women. This small...

متن کامل

In re K.I.: an urgent need for a uniform system in the treatment of the critically ill infant--recognizing the sanctity of life of the child.

The primary concern of physicians caring for children must be the best interests of the individual child. All infants and children have intrinsic value and deserve our respect and protection. This is true whether or not they are handicapped or have the potential to be handicapped and regardless of whether this handicap is physical or mental. This means that all children, regardless of handicap ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of medical ethics

دوره 14 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1988